🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an observance that began as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a corporate feel, expanding to include events where Black people are paid to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The wave has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in autumn in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The period has transformed since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a whole.

In the US, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the nation. A effort to remove Black history and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how minimally it can be influential if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. A university professor, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not avoid governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly the younger generation, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it fails to address the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that face all if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.